Whitepaper
  • Trusted Node $TNODE WhitePaper
  • Industry Backdrop
    • PoS Blockchains
    • Staking Market
    • Role of Validators
    • Staking rewards
    • Staking Pools
    • Staking-as-a-service (SAAS)
    • DeFi vs. PoS Staking
    • Lending Protocols vs. PoS Security
  • Industry Challenges
    • Entry barriers
    • Centralization and Resilience
  • Solution
    • The Network of Trusted Nodes
    • Unlocking Staking Liquidity
    • Gateway to multichain PoS
    • Democratic Access to PoS Governance and Staking
    • Infrastructure for PoS Security
  • Trusted Node Architecture
    • Inroduction
    • Staking Portal
    • Governance Portal
    • Liquid Staking
    • The Vaults
    • DAO Escrow Contract
  • User Rewards
    • Staking Rewards
    • Liquidity Yields
    • DAO Benefits
  • Trusted Node DAO
    • DAO Governance
  • DAO Revenue Model
    • DAO Architecture
  • Tokenomics
    • $TNODE
    • Token Supply and Allocation
    • Token Sale
  • Roadmap
    • Roadmap
  • Risks
    • Generalities
    • Validator/PoS risks
    • DeFi Risks
    • Network Security
    • Market Risks
  • Disclaimer
    • Disclaimer
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Risks

Network Security

Liquid Staking Risks could result in slightly lower network security due to staked capital being available for purchase rather than locked.

DAO Risks

DAOs are still an experiment in governance that may lead to many unforeseen situations. Trusted Node minimizes the risks by utilizing an established DAO platform, such as Aragon, with access to multiple governance tools and tested smart contracts.

Centralization Risks

Any governance can be subject to centralization if there are not enough participants. Trusted Node prevents voting power accumulation through DAO incentives, intuitive governance UX, and promoting awareness.

PreviousDeFi RisksNextMarket Risks

Last updated 3 years ago