Whitepaper
  • Trusted Node $TNODE WhitePaper
  • Industry Backdrop
    • PoS Blockchains
    • Staking Market
    • Role of Validators
    • Staking rewards
    • Staking Pools
    • Staking-as-a-service (SAAS)
    • DeFi vs. PoS Staking
    • Lending Protocols vs. PoS Security
  • Industry Challenges
    • Entry barriers
    • Centralization and Resilience
  • Solution
    • The Network of Trusted Nodes
    • Unlocking Staking Liquidity
    • Gateway to multichain PoS
    • Democratic Access to PoS Governance and Staking
    • Infrastructure for PoS Security
  • Trusted Node Architecture
    • Inroduction
    • Staking Portal
    • Governance Portal
    • Liquid Staking
    • The Vaults
    • DAO Escrow Contract
  • User Rewards
    • Staking Rewards
    • Liquidity Yields
    • DAO Benefits
  • Trusted Node DAO
    • DAO Governance
  • DAO Revenue Model
    • DAO Architecture
  • Tokenomics
    • $TNODE
    • Token Supply and Allocation
    • Token Sale
  • Roadmap
    • Roadmap
  • Risks
    • Generalities
    • Validator/PoS risks
    • DeFi Risks
    • Network Security
    • Market Risks
  • Disclaimer
    • Disclaimer
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Risks

DeFi Risks

Smart Contract risks

Hackers are working incessantly to find vulnerabilities in smart contracts’ code and exploit DeFi protocols that hold substantial amounts of capital. Once launched, smart contracts cannot be changed or updated like standard software, so the code needs to be thoroughly vetted ahead of time. To minimize contractual risks, Trusted Node employs industry experts such as Obelisk to audit the smart contracts across the network.

PreviousValidator/PoS risksNextNetwork Security

Last updated 3 years ago